What Terrible #Advertising Looks Like

 

This is what you get for...being on American Idol?

Last week I showed you what I think great advertising looks like. Now, I want to talk about the other side.

One of the key changes with advertising is that the customer has two things that, in previous decades, were never even considered:

Information

Buyers have multiple channels they can access to learn more about a product. Dial back 40 years, and there were two ways to learn. One, watch the commercial. Two, go to the store. Today’s online and digital ecosystem gives consumers an almost unlimited supply of information about every product out there.

Control

Because of this information, the control of the sales cycle has shifted completely to the consumer. She knows more than anyone else about the products she puts in her home. She exercises that control over her shopping habits. She does because she can.

Celebrity Endorsement

Celebrity endorsement is as old as advertising, and in some cases it works very well. Michael Jordan could endorse shoes because he wore them and you could buy them. Oprah “made” businesses that were lucky enough to find a space on her list of her favorite things.

A celebrity endorsement is either that the celebrity uses it, or that the celebrity thinks enough of the product that you should use it, or both. In the past several years, most advertisers have wizened up to the fact that a celebrity does not necessarily equal sales because consumers can see right through it, especially when the celebrity and the product simply do not belong together. A celebrity may show you how cool you’ll look, but your best friend may stand right next to you in the store and tell you it’s crap. Who are you going to believe?

So after seeing Jennifer Lopez in this commercial promoting the new $20,000 Fiat 500, I believe this is the worst piece of advertising I have seen in 2011.

Going back to the two reasons a celebrity may endorse a product, I am lost as to how this campaign was made.

Does anyone really think J Lo drives around in a $20,000 car? Her shoes cost more than that.

And even if J Lo inspires you, it seems Fiat would have better spent their money putting her in front of the camera saying, “I really think this Fiat 500 is inspiring, and I think you should buy one.” Because putting a relatively unknown vehicle in a video with one of the most recognizable faces on earth, you can guess with confidence what people will remember.

Olivier Franchois, the head of Fiat and chief marketing officer and brand communications for Chrysler Group, is quoted on billboard.biz about this spot.

“The primary objective of ‘My World’ was to explore the story of Jennifer Lopez, who is a cultural icon. The commercial tells the story of how the simple elements of our upbringing can help explain who we are, where we’re going and serve as a source of inspiration to achieve our goals in life. That drive and determination is the common thread that is shared with the Fiat brand and our philosophy that ‘Life Is Best When Driven.’”

Mr. Franchois needs to go back to marketing school. The primary objective of any advertising is to generate awareness and persuade viewers to take action. The primary objective is to sell stuff. This insults viewers by trying to convince them that Jenny from the block ain’t too proud to drive around in a car that costs less than the earrings she’s wearing. And by generating awareness, Mr. Franchois missed the mark. The voiceover, music, and several close-up shots of J Lo promote her, not the car.

Even someone on the comments for the YouTube video seem to question the motive of the effort:

Gosh, she would never drive Fiat, than, this is too much “make up” of what Bronx really looks like…

At the end of the day, Mr. Franchois must justify the cost of this campaign by generating awareness and selling cars. I’m sure he’ll generate awareness. I believe he’ll sell more J Lo records than Fiat cars.

  • Anonymous

    Jennifer Lopez is a cultural icon? Then I’d rather be uncultured. 

    Note that she  is never actually shown driving. Any of the scenes where she appears to be driving could be accomplished with a green screen. When the camera pulls out to show the Fiat from a distance, you never get a clear shot of the driver. (probably to avoid an insurance snafu.)

    As for Mr. Franchois’s take on the ad, well, it’s trite and unconvincing. Or maybe it’s me. I’ve just come to a point where most marketing messages sound like ‘blah blah woof buy blah woof woof grunt buy.’

    Maybe JLo DOES drive around in a $20,000 car when she wants to go incognito. Because she’d never drive a car that cost less than her shoes, right? So it can’t possibly be JLo behind the wheel.

    In any case, the car loses. You’re right. This is terrible advertising. There’s just nothing in it for anyone. Not even Lopez fans.

  • Ed Personius

    Classic ad industry non-sequiter piece.  The associations are so loose, the inferences so vague and so unlikely, it really is insulting to one’s intelligence.  Like J-Lo is constantly going back to the ‘hood to be inspired—what a bunch of bs.  And the car itself?  Tells us NOTHING!  The only thing I am sure of about the product and company from this piece, is that the car might lose in a beauty contest with the Smart Car, and Fiat’s marketing executives are idiots and should be fired along with their agency.

  • http://www.experiate.net Paul Flanigan

    Re Mr. Franchois: No, it’s not you. It’s crap. That’s the exact point.

    My .02 here, but this Fiat is a small, unspectacular car that is up against Honda Fit, Toyota Prius, and other well established small commute vehicles. It’s a relatively unknown brand in the U.S. So they went over the top to get awareness, but it backfires totally in favor of Ms. Lopez.

    That’s why I mentioned – wouldn’t it have just been better for her to get on camera saying, “This is a CUTE CAR! Buy one! I like it!” Wouldn’t that be more effective?

  • http://www.experiate.net Paul Flanigan

    Here’s what I don’t get: It’s Chrysler. The same car company that makes…the Chrysler. Isn’t that the car that Eminem pitches in Detroit? Why didn’t they learn from the success of that advertising?

    Weiden+Kennedy did the Eminem spot. They did a really nice spot. It’s about the car and the city. Eminem represents the imagery. Doner (the agency for the Fiat) just bombed here.

  • http://www.DOOH.com/ Tony Hymes

    I dont know, I see your point, putting J-Lo in a Fiat 500 is not necessarily an immediate connection, but she did have that song “Jenny from the Block” where she appears in a video a lot like this ad. I think what Fiat is doing here is saying, look, we are not some random Italian car company, we are a serious presence and we need a serious star. It would’ve been worse for them to bring in an Italian celebrity, like Roberto Benigni, and not be able to shed their Italian image. J Lo is driving around her ‘hood because these are the people that Fiat is targeting, both with their price point and image. They don’t say much about the car because to the American audience there is not much to say. Americans wont understand the history of the iconic car and it does not have many extras. It’s better to have J Lo in the car saying nothing about it than try to compete with other car ads that just feature the car itself and all of its benefits. What could they say? Buy the 500 because it’s cheap? It doesn’t cost much because it doesn’t offer much? A lawn mower engine, 12 horsepower, two doors, a back seat that can’t fit most children over 3? Or hey, J Lo likes it, so should you? I agree that she should probably just stand in front of the camera and beg consumers to buy it, but that might be too blatant. 

  • http://www.experiate.net Paul Flanigan

    I think you’re right, that Fiat is an Italian car trying to make a presence, and a great way to do that is to bring some star power into the act. But the overall execution is hollow. Good products, regardless of price, can sustain their message and resonance. I don’t see Fiat as a poor, or cheap, product. The problem is that Chrysler took something relatively unknown and essentially made it a prop in a J Lo commercial. As you said, this ad looks like her music video (which I have not seen).

    We, as consumers, want to see how products will be great in our lives. If so, then what is the point of putting J Lo in the car. Further – and this is where it insults the consumer – how can anyone related to J Lo driving THAT car?

    And in the day and age where everything to know about everything is available online, it was reported that she didn’t even drive the car in the commercial, or that she even step foot in the Bronx. (http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/jennifer-lopez-phony-fiat-ad-564812)

    So at the end of the ad, you are left wondering instead of inspired. And that’s the death knell for any campaign or product.

Previous post:

Next post: